Review collected by and hosted on G2.com. Many people who don't know Quark well, miss out on this feature. Collect for Output is a great feature when you need to get a project to the Printer. But, if you need more 'artistic' look of your publication, Adobe and Affinity suites, even Corel, are better solutions. In one program you can do everything you need to satisfy your publishing needs. Linking pages is nice too when you have to deal with alot of text or create a book/magazine/etc. If you work on book, or you need HTML5 or android/iPhone version of your publication, without additional costs, choose QuarkXPress. I often use command + M to access a palette where you can change around images imported into Quark, edit text, and arrange elements. I didn't like it so much because it was a little cumbersome to use, but this is because I had not done extensive training on my own to learn it, so I am slower at InDesign, but I am certain it can be just as good as Quark.

For users who are already familiar with previous versions of QuarkXPress, Qu. Two-thirds, through my college study, the professor started teaching us InDesign. Read reviews from worlds largest community for readers. I studied hard, and got really efficient at, so it's easy for me to go in and quickly do what I want with Quark.

I was trained to use Quark, as I earned my Bachelor of Fine Art degree in Graphic Design. I would say ease of use, but still this is a matter of preference.

Quarkxpress versions